Thursday, November 5, 2015

Mid-season bonus post: Flexing our muscles? How two "flex" games cost the Vikings everything.

Stop me if you’ve heard this one before.

The Vikings are off to a fast start, or they have successfully rebounded from a slow start to put themselves in the playoff hunt.  A seemingly ordinary game awaits them at noon against an opponent they should beat if they can just take care of business the way they have during this recent run of success.

That is, until the NFL, though no fault of its own, decides that a game between teams that seem evenly matched on paper and have similar, relevant records is the game that everyone wants to see.  The Vikings go into the game and are blinded by the lights, and get trounced in front of the entire nation; an outcome that might not have occurred had the game stayed at its original time.

As much fun as it is to see the Vikings getting on the right track and maybe even getting taken seriously again, the recent trend of “flexing” games into primetime (that have gained importance based on the week-to-week happenings of the NFL season) has not been tremendously kind to our favorite team.  For the sake of this post, I’m only considering games that got flexed to Sunday night.  I don’t really consider moving a noon game to 3:25 to be a “flex.”  (The Giants-Vikings MNF game in Detroit was not really a “flex,” either, but more of a necessity move, so it won’t be detailed here).

In 2007, the Vikings had an 8-6 record and suddenly saw a meaningful game against the Washington Redskins get thrust under the bright lights of Sunday Night Football on NBC (in just the second year of SNF on NBC).  The result: 22-0 Redskins at halftime and a 32-21 victory for Washington, whose players and coaches (and fans) were mourning the murder of Sean Taylor at the time.  This game cost the Vikings a playoff berth because all the Skins had to do was win in Week 17 to get in thanks to the tiebreaker over Minnesota.

The 2009 season, for all the good it brought Vikings fans, featured one of these as well.  The Vikes faced Arizona, a team that had blossomed under veteran QB Kurt Warner (nearly winning Super Bowl 43, the most recent at the time).  The Cardinals steadily built a 30-10 lead and won 30-17.  It was just the second loss of the season (10-2), but the Vikings won just two more games in the regular season to get the #2 seed. 

And we all know how that turned out.

The most recent Vikings game to get this treatment was the Philadelphia game in 2010.  There was nothing remotely compelling about this game; The Eagles were good and we were trash.  Brett Favre had been injured against the Bears, a Monday Night game, and this game has the distinction of marking the end of his legendary games-started streak.  Apparently the game was flexed to Sunday night, but moved to Tuesday night because of a major snowstorm on the east coast.  It remains one of the few Tuesday night football games in NFL history.  

Fondly remembered as the Joe Webb game, a fun bright spot in an otherwise dismal season, the Vikings managed to get a late-season win over an Eagles team that would qualify for the playoffs the following week. 

I guess in the long run, 1-2 in “flex” games isn’t so bad…but the fact remains that national television stumbles are a big part of Vikings lore.  The diehard fans behind Vikings Cavalcade hope that the Zimmer era can change that.

Although I personally don’t consider it a “flex,” earlier this week it was announced that the Vikings-Packers game in Week 11 is now “America’s Game of the Week” on Fox.  If the Vikings play their cards right, they’ll be 7-2 (best case scenario).  The Packers could be 8-1 (also best case scenario).  

This will be, without a doubt, the most meaningful Vikings-Packers clash since Week 17 of 2012, regardless of record.

But I’ll save any more words about that game for Week 11.  The big question I have is this; can the Vikings shed this label of “eternal national stage fright?”  



No comments:

Post a Comment